Glock 42 to be unveiled in January 2014

Started by The_Shadow, December 11 2013 09:35:11 PM MST

Previous topic - Next topic

Zephyr

A complete write-up is available in the February issue of Guns & Ammo.  The pistols vital stats are:  6 + 1 capacity, 13.4 ounces, 5.5 pound trigger DAO, 3-dot sights, and an MSRP of $475.00 USD.  It appears to be roughly have the size of Glock's G17.  Which will allow for a good purchase on the weapon.  Previously, only the Glock Model 28 in .380 ACP was available for law enforcement to acquire.  Due to import point-restrictions resulting from the GCA of 1968.  This seems like a smart move from a marketing standpoint.  Since, Glock was missing-out on this very lucrative market.
"I can assure you, we share very few sentiments with our government." - Pike Bishop, 'The Wild Bunch'

"I never rode shotgun on a hearse before." - Vin Tanner, 'The Magnificent Seven'

"His name is Elmiro Dungfoot!  And there is nothing supernatural about him!" - from 'Vampirella' #50


Rich10


StockIIBoss


4949shooter

I find it interesting that Glock is using a dual RSA for a cartridge that is often used in blow back designs. Especially with a slide that size.

DAVIDF

The slide is substantially smaller than any other Glock since the G42 weighs 7 ounces less than a G26.

4949shooter

Quote from: DAVIDF on January 05 2014 05:41:38 AM MST
The slide is substantially smaller than any other Glock since the G42 weighs 7 ounces less than a G26.

Yes I know. But it is bigger than most of the other .380 ultra compacts we see out there today, for example Ruger, Smith, and Colt. In other words, it won't be akin to firing an LCP.

Rich10

Quote from: 4949shooter on January 05 2014 05:46:41 AM MST
Quote from: DAVIDF on January 05 2014 05:41:38 AM MST
The slide is substantially smaller than any other Glock since the G42 weighs 7 ounces less than a G26.

Yes I know. But it is bigger than most of the other .380 ultra compacts we see out there today, for example Ruger, Smith, and Colt. In other words, it won't be akin to firing an LCP.

And yet it is still bigger than some company's offerings in 9mm, which makes it a total loser.

4949shooter

Quote from: Rich10 on January 05 2014 07:11:26 AM MST
Quote from: 4949shooter on January 05 2014 05:46:41 AM MST
Quote from: DAVIDF on January 05 2014 05:41:38 AM MST
The slide is substantially smaller than any other Glock since the G42 weighs 7 ounces less than a G26.

Yes I know. But it is bigger than most of the other .380 ultra compacts we see out there today, for example Ruger, Smith, and Colt. In other words, it won't be akin to firing an LCP.

And yet it is still bigger than some company's offerings in 9mm, which makes it a total loser.

It might be. The point of my post being, with a larger slide and dual RSA, Glock may be thinking of a single stack 9mm for the future.

DAVIDF

I don't whether it uses a dual recoil spring is a good indication of whether Glock will introduce a 9mm on the same platform. I think that is more of a marketing or durability decision. I think what is more important is how narrow the slide is at .836 inches. That is less than the Kahr PM9 at .9 inches. The Kahr weighs more than 2 ounces more than the G42. Can a 9mm be built as small as the G42 and sill be durable/reliable and stand up to tens of thousands of rounds of ammo? I don't know. Are there other examples that have?

4949shooter

Don't know.  My thought was that Glock made an awfully durable gun for a .380. They slimmed down the slide for the G36 and 30S also, and even the new Glock .45, so my thinking was perhaps they were planning a single stack 9mm of the same or similar size. I could be wrong though.

Time will tell..

DAVIDF

Quote from: Rich10 on January 05 2014 07:11:26 AM MST
Quote from: 4949shooter on January 05 2014 05:46:41 AM MST
Quote from: DAVIDF on January 05 2014 05:41:38 AM MST
The slide is substantially smaller than any other Glock since the G42 weighs 7 ounces less than a G26.

Yes I know. But it is bigger than most of the other .380 ultra compacts we see out there today, for example Ruger, Smith, and Colt. In other words, it won't be akin to firing an LCP.

And yet it is still bigger than some company's offerings in 9mm, which makes it a total loser.

Bigger than some company's offerings in 9mm only in length & height. Only the Rohrbaugh R9 is narrower or lighter.  And, it is only .24 ounces lighter. They recommend standard pressure loads only, no +p or +p+ load. And, from what I've read they do not recommend extensive shooting thru their pistol as it is built so light.

StockIIBoss

Quote
Bigger than some company's offerings in 9mm only in length & height. Only the Rohrbaugh R9 is narrower or lighter.  And, it is only .24 ounces lighter. They recommend standard pressure loads only, no +p or +p+ load. And, from what I've read they do not recommend extensive shooting thru their pistol as it is built so light.


I carry a Diamondback DB9, which is actually 'the' smallest and lightest out there. .80" wide, 12.8 oz with empty mag, 6+1 no +P, 4.0" height, 5.6" length. 

DAVIDF

I missed the DB9 while trying to search to see if there was anything currently produced that was slimmer. Diamondback actually lists the weight as 11 ounces (perhaps w/o a mag). How is it to shoot at that light weight & small grips? I find my G20 more comfortable to shoot than my G26, particularly weak handed.