Zimmerman not guilty

[EdMc]

Perhaps the country would be better served if the DOJ investigated itself as to it's actions in 'Fast & Furious' and Milwaukee, rather than focusing on an event better handled by local and state jurisdiction. Unless, of course, your purpose is deflection of attention from more important matters.

[Ramjet]

Inter cooler you need to get copy of the testimony then you will see it is not as the liberal media wants you to think the jury stuck to the facts.

Zimmerman had right to stop the threat he was in immediate and imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm. His responsibility was to protect himself and the evidence was certainly convincing enough for the jury of 6 women 5 of them mothers to acquit Zimmerman. Those jurors heard all the evidence we can only use conjecture and opinion neither of which app carry the weight of that jury. 

[DenStinett]

, and Martin didn't go home.

Exactly right
He was well ahead of Zimmerman, and in fact, Zimmerman had lost sight of Trayvon
He had more than enough time to make it home, and / or call the COPs himself
It is very sad, but Trayvon had all the control
If Trayvon hadn't made the wrong (conscience) choice to turn and fight, he'd still be alive today

[Steve4102]

He ended up in the same area. Everything I read said he was tailing him or in the area with him. The initial phone call may have prevented the whole thing... if he left at that point.

  You read incorrect propaganda.

GZ did was he was asked to do. He was a "Neighborhood Watch" member and his job was to "Watch" his neighborhood and report to the police any suspicious persons or activity. This is what he did.

If you listen to the 911 tape (the original) the officer asked him, "where is he now" GZ took that to mean, get out of your vehicle and find out where TM was. That is what he did. When the officer realized what GZ was doing (looking for TM on foot) she said "you don't need to do that" He said "OK" and headed back to his vehicle where he was attacked.

He did exactly what he was asked to do. Watch his neighborhood, call 911, find "where is he know".

[Mike_Fontenot]

It's NOT illegal to follow someone, provided you are entitled to be where you are.  It IS illegal to assault someone, and pound his head against a concrete slab ... THAT can get you shot.

[Steve4102]

It's NOT illegal to follow someone, provided you are entitled to be where you are.  It IS illegal to assault someone, and pound his head against a concrete slab ... THAT can get you shot.

Not only is it NOT Illegal, it is what a "Neighborhood Watch" members is asked to do.  "Watch" and Report.

[gandog56]

Inter cooler you need to get copy of the testimony then you will see it is not as the liberal media wants you to think the jury stuck to the facts.

Zimmerman had right to stop the threat he was in immediate and imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm. His responsibility was to protect himself and the evidence was certainly convincing enough for the jury of 6 women 5 of them mothers to acquit Zimmerman. Those jurors heard all the evidence we can only use conjecture and opinion neither of which app carry the weight of that jury.

All I can think here, was just how many BLACK people were on this jury? My guess is NONE! (I don't know, just guessing)

[Steve4102]

Inter cooler you need to get copy of the testimony then you will see it is not as the liberal media wants you to think the jury stuck to the facts.

Zimmerman had right to stop the threat he was in immediate and imminent threat of death or grave bodily harm. His responsibility was to protect himself and the evidence was certainly convincing enough for the jury of 6 women 5 of them mothers to acquit Zimmerman. Those jurors heard all the evidence we can only use conjecture and opinion neither of which app carry the weight of that jury.

All I can think here, was just how many BLACK people were on this jury? My guess is NONE! (I don't know, just guessing)

   If you actually payed attention to the case and the evidence you would know that there were no Black men on the Jury.  They were all women, all six of them.

   During the Jury selection there was one Black Male that was accepted by the DEFENSE, but was dismissed and rejected by the Prosecution.   Yes, that's right, the Prosecution rejected the Black male from the jury.

   Jessie Jackson made the same comment on one of the Left wing media outlets just the other day.  That must be were you heard it, yes.

  Something  that you and Jessie fail to realize is that according to the CONSTITUTION  the "Jury of Peers"  is selected to represent the accused, George Zimmerman and not Travon as TM was not the one on trial.

 

 

[Steve4102]

  Now that you know the Jury that found GZ Innocent was made up of all women, I'm guessing you would picture them like this. yes?  After all, this whole trial was about racism on the part of GZ and not the facts right.

[Mr. AR50]

This case should never have gone to trial, but once a 'special prosecutor' was assigned to 'investigate', it was no longer about self defense. It became an opportunity for the Obama administration to further divide this country through race, and to promote an agenda near and dear to Obama- GUN CONTROL! Obama's own comments, "If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon", and "We must find a way to put an end to gun violence" prove this.
GZ was tried in front of a jury of his peers and found innocent. That should be the end of it.

[pacapcop]

He was attacked and in fear,end of story.He was getting his ass handed to him.

[Mr. AR50]

That's what I meant when I said that this should never have gone to trial. It was an obvious case of self defense.

[gandog56]

He was attacked and in fear,end of story.He was getting his ass handed to him.

So HE says. It worked, and of course they're rioting in L.A., beating people and looting stores. I knew that was going to happen!

[DM1906]

He was attacked and in fear,end of story.He was getting his ass handed to him.

So HE says.It worked, and of course they're rioting in L.A., beating people and looting stores. I knew that was going to happen!

He did.  The facts and evidence are consistent with his statement, and there are ZERO facts or evidence to indicate otherwise.  Any other notion is pure speculation, not supported by anything.  Possibilities and "what if's" are a long stretch to question the Constitutional liberties of any free American.  Innocent, unless and until PROVED otherwise.  It's the same process of justice you would suggest that is the reason for the riots.  Ignore facts you don't like, make up your own where none exist, and convict according to what you think happened, and/or what you think would be popular with those who may support your political agenda.  No different than the Salem witch hunts, or the Spanish Inquisition.  Most countries in this world have this system of justice, and is one of the basic reasons THIS country exists, today.

[Steve4102]

He was attacked and in fear,end of story.He was getting his ass handed to him.

So HE says.

NO WRONG!!  So says the evidence and a Jury of HIS peers.