357Magnum Precision Made Cartridges (PMC) 150gr Starfire SFJHP Pull-Down

Started by The_Shadow, May 30 2013 09:14:00 PM MDT

Previous topic - Next topic

The_Shadow

Cartridge is from Ammo Manufacture:Precision Made Cartridges (PMC) 150gr Starfire SFJHP
Ballistics Information: 357 Magnum
Muzzle Velocity: 1205 fps (Starfire data shows)
Muzzle Energy: 484 ft. lbs
Pictures: Before/After disassembly:
Brass Make/Headstamp: PMC - Brass
Bullet Make/Weight/Construction/Info; Length 0.6400"/Dia. 0.3560":  150gr. Starfire JHP
Actual weigh 150.0 grains  Cannelure Diameter 0.3525" 
HP Dia 0.0990" segmented pleats  HP Depth 0.1920" Mouth 0.1945"
C.O.A.L.: 1.5760"
Primer: Brass color
Case: Diameter 0.3755" Crimp Diameter 0.3750" Length 1.2830"
Powder Description/Positive ID/Type/Charge Weight: H-110/W 296  13.6 grains
Tested in the S&W model 19 6" 1575 fps /1518 fps June 8, 2013
Case expanded to 0.3825", primer slightly flattened, case look good.







The "10mm" I'm Packin', Has The Bullets Wackin', Smakin' & The Slide is Rackin' & Jackin'!
NRA Life Member
Southeast, LoUiSiAna

REDLINE

Gun Control?  Oh yes, the theory that becoming a victim is somehow morally superior to defending yourself & your family.  Makes perfect sense.

Intercooler

I wonder what it will do in my 6" GP100 when I pick it up? Raggedyman has these for gel and it will be interesting!

The_Shadow

I made a change to the powder as further review I think it is H-110/W 296 
The "10mm" I'm Packin', Has The Bullets Wackin', Smakin' & The Slide is Rackin' & Jackin'!
NRA Life Member
Southeast, LoUiSiAna

DM1906

Quote from: The_Shadow on May 31 2013 10:02:05 AM MDT
I made a change to the powder as further review I think it is H-110/W 296

Not too sure about that, for a few reasons.

While the charge weight is close to W296/H110 performance, the powder doesn't appear like either of my old W296, or new H110.  Your pictured granules appear larger than the 13.6 gr. I trickled into my RCBS scale pan, the granules are too smooth and spherical, and the charge results in about an 80% case fill (big NO-NO with these powders).  Unless this was a accidental "light" charge (which can result in a squib), I don't think it's W296/H110.  It would about the least efficient powder (economy and performance) for this bullet weight and velocity.  It's a fairly anemic .357, in any case.  PMC's website advertises 1350/607 (muzzle), , which is more inline with common factory loadings for similar bullet weight and design.  About 15+ gr. W296/H110 would be more likely to achieve the advertised 1350 FPS.
Life's tough. It's tougher if you're stupid. -- The Duke

The_Shadow

Those were my reasons at first, but I found a chart for the PMC performance specs.  The velocities were too low for the charge weight of the #9 but a reduced charge of H-110/W 296 @ 13.6 grains would place it in the right range...
The "10mm" I'm Packin', Has The Bullets Wackin', Smakin' & The Slide is Rackin' & Jackin'!
NRA Life Member
Southeast, LoUiSiAna


New to reloading? Get a great kit for a great price today!

Using this link at Amazon for your purchase helps the forum out with small commission. Your price and Amazon benefits stay the same!

Start shooting more today (cause you won't actually save)