New military round?

Started by 38-40, November 03 2018 08:19:24 AM MDT

Previous topic - Next topic

38-40

https://www.foxnews.com/tech/new-army-bullets-bigger-bolder-and-harder-hitting
With all the different calibers available you would think one would work without spending a million dollars to come with something new


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
You can't fix stupid but you can numb it for a while with a 2X4

The_Shadow

It seem that Government agencies can't make up their minds on anything...FBI left the 10mm opted for 40S&W but also going back to 9mm, Law Enforcement leaving the 40S&W going back to 9mm.  Oh well like we say down here in Louisiana " C'est la vie",  translated as "That's life" or "Such is Life"...

One thing I like about the 6.8 SPC cartridge is that it can be trimmed to be used in 10mm.  I recently made some snakeshot loads using 6.8 brass and my 9x25Dillon dies...
The "10mm" I'm Packin', Has The Bullets Wackin', Smakin' & The Slide is Rackin' & Jackin'!
NRA Life Member
Southeast, LoUiSiAna

sqlbullet

I think it is very likely this will be a militarized 6.8 SPC the same way as the 5.56 is a militarized 223 Remington.

However, this assumes they will want to stick with their investment in the AR-15/M16/M4 platform of guns.  If they are going to field a completely new rifle at the same time they don't have to stick with rounds that work in the AR-15 platform.

OTOH, a larger platform is more weight, and ammo based on anything much larger than the 6.8/30 Remington will start to hit payload a soldier can carry significantly.

6.8 SPC that is tweaked is my bet.  But by no means a prophecy.

Chefgerg

It was several years ago SSA produced a tungsten penetrator round for the 6.8 SPC. It never hit the market to my knowledge.It is my understanding that when Nosler bought SSA they did not secure the rights for the penetrator round. I am wondering if DOD has secured the right for it or maybe Nosler has. This round was suppose to be able to penetrate level IV Body armor. I never have seen any proof of it but your guess is as good as mine.

38-40

It was mentioned that a harder hitting more effective round would reduce number of rounds needed in a firefight offsetting the weight factor.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You can't fix stupid but you can numb it for a while with a 2X4

Pablo

I really hope they carry through with this and use 6.8. I'm not a 5.56 hater, but the 6.8SPCII is just a better military round.

Graybeard

Quote from: Chefgerg on November 03 2018 11:37:17 PM MDT
It was several years ago SSA produced a tungsten penetrator round for the 6.8 SPC. It never hit the market to my knowledge.It is my understanding that when Nosler bought SSA they did not secure the rights for the penetrator round. I am wondering if DOD has secured the right for it or maybe Nosler has. This round was suppose to be able to penetrate level IV Body armor. I never have seen any proof of it but your guess is as good as mine.

I would bet there would be a pretty significant cost increase for a 6.8 tungsten penetrator.

Pumpkinheaver

From what I have read the army is trying to go caseless to ammunition. Doubt it will be the 6.8SPC II.


New to reloading? Get a great kit for a great price today!

Using this link at Amazon for your purchase helps the forum out with small commission. Your price and Amazon benefits stay the same!

Start shooting more today (cause you won't actually save)