Federal judge rules Obama executive amnesty unlawful

Started by Patriot, February 17 2015 06:31:03 AM MST

Previous topic - Next topic

Wolfie

The Presidents job is to protect the Constitution, if Congress fails at protecting it, its the Executives job.

Its in his oath of office.

Rich10

#31
Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 10:08:19 AM MST
The Presidents job is to protect the Constitution, if Congress fails at protecting it, its the Executives job.

Its in his oath of office.

Uphold, protect, and abide by....

He tramples it and openly admits it.

redbaron007

Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 10:08:19 AM MST
The Presidents job is to protect the Constitution, if Congress fails at protecting it, its the Executives job.

Its in his oath of office.

Negative Ghostrider!

You've drunk way tooo much koolaid if you believe what you've just stated.
Some days it's just good to be lucky; rather than just good looking!

Wolfie

Whats the negative?

Thats how it works.

We are being invaded, Congress is not acting and the president it.

I am 100% for this lawsuit, if the GOP wins, it will be de facto amnesty anyway.

redbaron007

Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 03:00:45 PM MST
Whats the negative?

Thats how it works.

We are being invaded, Congress is not acting and the president it.

I am 100% for this lawsuit, if the GOP wins, it will be de facto amnesty anyway.

Rich10 answered if for me.

The presidential oath........"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."

It's not one or the other...it's all of the above.....'preserve, protect and defend'.  Executive Orders and/or Executive Memos are one piece of a presidents' powers; however, a president can issue a EO/EM that could be against the Constitution/Law.

What about this lawsuit are you 100% for? Possibly giving the Repubs a black eye?  What do you mean by  'de facto amnesty'?  Not sure I understand that.
Some days it's just good to be lucky; rather than just good looking!

Buckeye 50

Wolfie;

AGREED: We ARE being invaded and the president IS doing something about it  -  HELPING THE INVADERS!!

My tactical trainer was with the U.S. Border Patrol for many years - got out after our Islamic president's first term in his regime.  The stories I have heard are truly incredible.  Swears they are true.
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty."

John F. Kennedy

Wolfie

Ask your border patrol friend why the GOP did not lock down the borders after 911.

Rich10

#37
Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 06:22:35 PM MST
Ask your border patrol friend why the GOP did not lock down the borders after 911.

I still haven't figured out what you mean by the border being open after 9/11.

Example- http://pulitzercenter.org/reporting/mexico-border-closings-deportation-juarez-drug
_________________________________________________________________________________________
On the flip side, Obama has been telling agencies to ignore federal law.  He has hurt national security in more ways  than any other president.

Wolfie

The borders are more secure under Obama than Bush.

No one complained when Bush did nothing.

The complainers, those that live in GOP states have no problem with their governments not requiring E Verify.


Rich10

#39
Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 07:29:01 PM MST
The borders are more secure under Obama than Bush


Ok  :-\


How many tens of thousands has he let walk through in the last year?

Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 07:29:01 PM MST

No one complained when Bush did nothing.


You ignore facts as shown.


______________________________________________________________
You're delusional.

Wolfie


Rich10

Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 08:05:53 PM MST
I know, numbers just lie.

Numbers? Like deportation numbers?  That's different from saying secure border, but, ok- http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117412/deportations-under-obama-vs-bush-who-deported-more-immigrants

Quote from: Rich10 on February 18 2015 07:39:42 PM MST
Quote from: Wolfie on February 18 2015 07:29:01 PM MST
The borders are more secure under Obama than Bush


Ok  :-\


How many tens of thousands has he let walk through in the last year?  He literally invited illegals in.

Wolfie

The left is increasingly angry with President Obama, calling him the "deporter-in-chief." That's because the total number of deportations during Obama's tenure recently passed 2 million. As Dara Lind wrote last week at Vox, that pace puts him on track to "have deported more people by the end of 2014 than George W. Bush did in his entire eight years." 


Buckeye 50

Obama, like Hilary, can only complain about the past and have no actions of their own to point to.
"Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe to assure the survival and the success of liberty."

John F. Kennedy