Go to about 1:33 if you have a short attention span
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ysZmSKrpac
I think I saw that, but Youtube says it's blocked in my country (Socialist Republic of Kalifornia). What is the key point you are referring?
Trump lost Iowa.
Bad news for him. Today the Establishment, FOX News and el Rushbo have taken Rubio's side. Trump may still win, but he is weaker and the GOPe are about to do work on him.
Bank on it.
Trump didn't lose. His ROI was the highest of the bunch. He had nothing invested, had no ground game, and won a strong second seat (greater support than any previous winner, let alone a runner-up). A debate appearance and/or more ground work would have put him over the top. Rubio was a bit of a surprise, but 3rd place isn't better than second. It was one state, with a screwy primary process (nothing wrong with it, chose your representatives however you like). At the end of the day, it was the first state, with a few to go, yet. Oh, and $6M raised for veterans (in less time than the caucus)? Doesn't sound like a loss, to me.
Quote from: Wolfie on February 02 2016 09:45:40 PM MST
[...] Today the Establishment, FOX News and el Rushbo have taken Rubio's side.
Why has Rush chosen Rubio over Cruz? Maybe he doesn't think Cruz can win the general election?
Quote from: Captain_Witness on February 02 2016 09:02:39 PM MST
Go to about 1:33 if you have a short attention span
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ysZmSKrpac
Took him a long time to get to the 2nd Amendment stuff (about 44 minutes), but it was surprisingly positive.
Quote from: Wolfie on February 02 2016 09:45:40 PM MST
Trump lost Iowa.
Bad news for him. Today the Establishment, FOX News and el Rushbo have taken Rubio's side. Trump may still win, but he is weaker and the GOPe are about to do work on him.
Bank on it.
The last two winners of Iowa didn't get the nomination, so it's not all that important. Haven't heard that Rush is for Rubio, if so it's the last time I'll listen to him. If the GOP is stupid enough to choose Rubio (Mr illegal alien Amnesty) then they will lose the election and this country is finished as we know it, and will become a permanent demoncat oligarchy
Quote from: DM1906 on February 02 2016 09:30:51 PM MST
I think I saw that, but Youtube says it's blocked in my country (Socialist Republic of Kalifornia). What is the key point you are referring?
He said "We will not harm the 2nd, we need to EXPAND IT"
Dare any of you to present a presidential candidate who has said that in the past 100 years
Trump was closer to third than first, now he is crying that Cruz stole the election.
The GOPe does not want Trump because a racist will get blown out in the General, they do not want Cruz as he will also lose. They like Rubio as he can be CONTROLLED and has a outside shot.
Watch money to start going to Rubio big.
Quote from: Wolfie on February 03 2016 11:53:07 AM MST
Trump was closer to third than first, now he is crying that Cruz stole the election.
The GOPe does not want Trump because a racist will get blown out in the General, they do not want Cruz as he will also lose. They like Rubio as he can be CONTROLLED and has a outside shot.
Watch money to start going to Rubio big.
False accusation. Trump is not a "racist" as testified to by how many blacks and latinos support him. What Trump is, is an America firster, as I am. The neo-con beltway Rubio will be another Romney, because folks like me won't vote for him, staying home again. Trump appeals to independents as well as millions of people who have never voted before, or gave up voting. Trump is going to win New Hampshire http://www.whdh.com/story/31126831/hiller-instinct-7newsumass-lowell-new-hampshire-tracking-poll-day-3
So that was not Trump 3 days ago saying he would bomb the sh*t out of ISIL.
Sounds pretty neocon to me, never mind that he let his daughter marry a Jewish person.
Quote from: Wolfie on February 03 2016 11:53:07 AM MST
They like Rubio as he can be CONTROLLED and has a outside shot.
I think THAT is the source of much of Trump's popularity ... he is the least-likely candidate to be "controllable". And I think that's the source of Democrats' (and also establishment Republicans') fear of Trump getting nominated.
Is there an assumption here that Rubio is anti 2nd Amendment?
Sarah Palin's comments about Cruz https://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin/posts/10153929150093588
Quote from: Wolfie on February 03 2016 12:36:39 PM MST
So that was not Trump 3 days ago saying he would bomb the sh*t out of ISIL.
Sounds pretty neocon to me, never mind that he let his daughter marry a Jewish person.
The difference is he does not want to nationbuild, merely take out enemies (yeah, I know, really, but they
are attacking us) There's no perfect candidate but the next election is for the soul of this country, as at least 2 and maybe 4 USSC judges will be replaced, chosen by the next president
Quote from: Captain_Witness on February 03 2016 10:21:19 AM MST
He said "We will not harm the 2nd, we need to EXPAND IT"
How do you expand on "...shall not be infringed"?
I think we should just enforce it.
I think our gun laws should be centered around penalties that get applied when my bullets start going into other people or their stuff. Not around who can buy what and take it where, when.
Quote from: Captain_Witness on February 03 2016 12:08:48 PM MST
... because folks like me won't vote for him, staying home again.
I haven't gone to the polls to vote for someone for decades. When I was young, stupid and idealistic I did, and now realize those votes were cast for swine.
I go to the polls to vote
against people. I didn't vote for Mitt Romney or John McCain, I voted against Barack Obama. I didn't vote for George W Bush, I voted against Al Gore and John Kerry.
If you want to participate in making the candidates better, get involved locally in who gets started in politics. But at the national level, it is about voting against the greater of evils, not for someone who is good.
Quote from: sqlbullet on February 03 2016 12:57:04 PM MST
Quote from: Captain_Witness on February 03 2016 10:21:19 AM MST
He said "We will not harm the 2nd, we need to EXPAND IT"
How do you expand on "...shall not be infringed"?
I think we should just enforce it.
Trouble is, different people interprete "shall not be infringed" differently. Obama would probably tell you that nothing he has proposed "infringes" ... how could "common sense" legislation possibly "infringe"?
I hear you.
This is why I like to have a dialog with gun control folks about the first amendment. They are always rabid supporters which I agree with completely. I then talk about proposed regulations on the tools of speech, such as restrictions on internet access. Again, they see this as a huge problem. Restricting access to the tools of speech is a restriction on speech.
Then I ask if they think we have a right to life. Of course. Right to defend said life? Yes, of course. Then by extension any action which restricts my right to tools to defend life restricts my right to life.
Most bluster at this point, but some become thoughtful.
Quote
\in-?frinj\
to encroach upon in a way that violates ... the rights of another
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/infringe
Sorry Captain, the GOP in 2000 ran AGAINST nation building and what happened?
Now on to Shall Not be Infringed, are you guys kidding? Where in the Constitution does it say a felony, domestic violence or dishonorable discharge disqualifies you from carrying?
It does not.
Ever read any old west stories? You had to check your gun into the Sheriffs office in certain towns. You guys act as if Obama is taking your guns away, this started way before him.
Psst, Rubio bought a gun around Christmas, that means he is now the real deal.
Each and every one gets to choose.
My number one hasn't changed. I'm still with Carson, based on his views of the founding fathers, constitution, and natural law.
My second choice would be Carly, because she recognizes how the big business - big bank - big government forces have destroyed the level playing field for the little guy starting out.
The stunts the Cruz campaign pulled in Iowa have soured me on him in a big way. I had previously had a measure of respect, but he now has a long way to go to earn any level of trust in my book. Lying and cheating to get ones way and stuffing a bible in my face are way to inconsistent in my book.
Maybe I'll just write the name of my dog on the ballot.
Greg
Quote from: Wolfie on February 03 2016 01:29:25 PM MST
Psst, Rubio bought a gun around Christmas, that means he is now the real deal.
Frankly I find that stupidly snarky. Do you have anything about Rubio and the 2nd Amendment?
Of course it is a stupid remark.
How dare I question anyone.
I recall Romney who was pro gay pro abortion and anti gun while governor. And when he ran for president he saw "Jesus" and changed his stances.
I have news for all of you, MOST Republicans could care less about guns all they care about is your vote.
Quote from: Wolfie on February 03 2016 06:24:08 PM MST
Of course it is a stupid remark.
How dare I question anyone.
I recall Romney who was pro gay pro abortion and anti gun while governor. And when he ran for president he saw "Jesus" and changed his stances.
I have news for all of you, MOST Republicans could care less about guns all they care about is your vote.
Do you have anything about Rubio and the 2nd Amendment?
Quote from: Geeman on February 03 2016 05:31:50 PM MST
My second choice would be Carly, because she recognizes how the big business - big bank - big government forces have destroyed the level playing field for the little guy starting out.
Carly should be able to recognize how big businesses destroyed the field for the little guy. She destroyed many people's lives at Hewlett Packard. She was so bad, they fired her.
.
OK. guys, you are all mavericks who should enjoy a sea hag or crazy bernie presidency. Glad I am retreating into a rural survival situation..
Bernie or Trump would be my choice. Both are outsiders enough that they won't get much done, which is ideal since I don't want them doing much.
This is why I say cut a deal with Obama for National Reciprocity and or whatever else for Background Checks.
No way we get it with Hillary.
For those betting on the GOP to protect the 2nd, how did the GOP do stopping Gay Marriage and Obamacare?
Democrats think long term with Demographics on their side, if Romney had Reagan's demographics he would have won.
Republicans think short term, they sucker you for your vote and then sell you out. Look at the last budget, liberals got everything in exchange for oil exports for the rich.
I used to listen to Howard Stern back in the day as a young patrolman. He called this KKK guy down south whose message was "wake up white people," he was 100% correct. The GOP plays white people like a fiddle and they do nothing for us.
Go ahead and shut me down and give me ONE example were the GOP has done anything for us since Ike.
Quote from: Wolfie on February 04 2016 09:08:02 AM MST
Go ahead [...] and give me ONE example were the GOP has done anything for us since Ike.
Scalia.
Quote from: sqlbullet on February 04 2016 08:20:01 AM MST
Bernie [...] would be my choice.
Man, that comment, coming from someone who supposedly values his gun rights, depresses me more about the future of our gun rights than anything I've heard for a long time. We're doomed.
One thing that is very clear is the thick fabric is woven such the the corruption covers all parties and both side of the isles as well.
It is spread like butter over all branches of our big, out of control, overbearing greedy government gone wild for power and control...it has be sugar coated throughout with Obummer's Islamic Brotherhood, as he is paving the way for the implementation of Sharia Law. If it is enacted and / or once in place, we will only have one recourse and that will be a all out civil war to regain what we will lose or have already lost. The steps of dumbing down the people, pushing the change into the educational curriculum has been implemented and the damage is becoming apparent.
What I see, and I know others have to also see this coming, is that they will use the rule of law (Sharia Law) to put an end to America and our way of life...
Therefore the time is now to elect someone that will put a stop to this movement and reverse the tide of change that has flowed for the last 7 1/2 years...
To make America Great Again, it will take a lot of clearing out of the Senate and Representatives, who are immersed in the corruption of big corporate back room deals...
Trump's a shrewd businessman and it will not be easy because this is a runaway government, with hidden ties to protect their turf (banking, stock market, contracts, etc)...it has gone way beyond "We The People" >:(
Quote from: Wolfie on February 04 2016 09:08:02 AM MST
For those betting on the GOP to protect the 2nd, how did the GOP do stopping Gay Marriage and Obamacare?
Democrats think long term with Demographics on their side, if Romney had Reagan's demographics he would have won.
Republicans think short term, they sucker you for your vote and then sell you out. Look at the last budget, liberals got everything in exchange for oil exports for the rich.
I used to listen to Howard Stern back in the day as a young patrolman. He called this KKK guy down south whose message was "wake up white people," he was 100% correct. The GOP plays white people like a fiddle and they do nothing for us.
Go ahead and shut me down and give me ONE example were the GOP has done anything for us since Ike.
You got that right.
The Neo-Cuck-cuckservatives are the Democrats bit**es. The Democrats play the Republicucks like the fools they are.
Republicans defending the 2nd amendment? Remember this statement: "Read my lips. No new gun laws"? That is from Bush the first.
.
Scalia?
It was his case law in a previous suit, that was cited to affirm gay marriage as the law of the land.
WASHINGTON -- When U.S. District Judge Orlando Garcia of the Western District of Texas struck down the Lone Star State's ban on gay marriage on Wednesday, he cited the words of a man who is normally a friend to conservatives: Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.
Garcia, a Clinton appointee who had previously served in the Texas legislature, could have cited any number of opinions to undermine the state's contention that the ability of many opposite-sex couples to procreate, as well as "tradition," justified denying equal marriage rights to same-sex couples.
But the federal judge didn't cite just any Supreme Court justice. He chose to quote from Scalia's dissent in the landmark 2003 case Lawrence v. Texas, which struck down the state's anti-sodomy law.
In 2003, Scalia was trying to argue that the Supreme Court was wrong to overturn laws based on moral choices. He wrote that the decision in Lawrence v. Texas called into question laws against same-sex marriage (and also, he believed, bigamy, adult incest and prostitution) because other justifications for banning same-sex marriage -- including those that Texas would cite in support of its own ban a decade later -- weren't legitimate.
In explaining why tradition alone can't form a rational basis for a law, Garcia pointed to Scalia's argument in the 2003 dissent that the phrase "the traditional institution of marriage" is "just a kinder way of describing the State's moral disapproval of same-sex couples."
And in explaining why the biological ability of many opposite-sex couples to procreate doesn't justify denying equal rights to same-sex couples, Garcia cited Scalia, too.
"[W]hat justification could there possibly be for denying the benefits of marriage to homosexual couples exercising 'the liberty protected by the Constitution'? Surely not the encouragement of procreation, since the sterile and the elderly are allowed to marry," Scalia wrote at the time.
Garcia isn't the first federal judge to use Scalia's words to undermine a state's defense of a gay marriage ban. In Utah, Ohio, Virginia and Kentucky, federal judges fully embraced Scalia's predictions last year in his dissent in United States v. Windsor, the case that struck down key portions of the federal Defense of Marriage Act. Scalia wrote in that dissent that he believed the majority's logic would inevitably lead to other judges striking down same-sex marriage bans.
I can't let you get away with this. Read what Scalia wrote and they'll find him arguing hypothetically. An intellectually dishonest person abused a quote. You're propagating his dishonesty by reciting it here.
What is your purpose in doing that?
A honest lawyer?
Where?
Quote from: Mike_Fontenot on February 04 2016 09:42:00 AM MST
Quote from: sqlbullet on February 04 2016 08:20:01 AM MST
Bernie [...] would be my choice.
Man, that comment, coming from someone who supposedly values his gun rights, depresses me more about the future of our gun rights than anything I've heard for a long time. We're doomed.
Mike, you gotta take that comment in context. If I were the only man with a vote? No. I would probably pick Shadow, or maybe you.
But looking at the field we have to choose from? Every single one of them that is a "party" man, regardless of which party, is going to screw me. So I am picking the guys that the parties don't want, because they will have no caucus for their initiatives.
I will fight, probably harder than most for my gun rights. Perhaps you missed my soliloquy of compromise for universal background checks. To summarize, it's only an infraction if you don't do one, and we get back SBR's, silencers without NFA, and the machine gun registry opened up to new guns, AND national reciprocity. And, they records of the transactions have to be one-way encrypted. That way they can't be reverse engineered into a national registry.
The problem I see is the belief that any of the Republican candidates will actually do what they say. Not one of them has that record. They will gladly sell your gun rights if it benefits them and their cronies. I would rather face a knife in front of me than be shot in the back by my own "guy".
Quote from: Captain_Witness on February 03 2016 10:21:19 AM MST
Quote from: DM1906 on February 02 2016 09:30:51 PM MST
I think I saw that, but Youtube says it's blocked in my country (Socialist Republic of Kalifornia). What is the key point you are referring?
He said "We will not harm the 2nd, we need to EXPAND IT"
Dare any of you to present a presidential candidate who has said that in the past 100 years
And yet he openly supported an assault weapon ban as recently that I can find as 2008. Trump is just as two faced as the rest.
Quote from: Bruno747 on February 05 2016 04:42:06 PM MSTTrump is just as two faced as the rest.
They are all the same. He just knows how people really feel, so he knows which bull-crap to sell to the masses.
.
Gun Mfg. - First hand working with Trump experience ... & paying for the right NOT to be pawned:
" I've met a lot of people in life and I have found it best to form opinions about them by actually meeting them in person. In 2009 I agreed to do that tv show Celebrity Apprentice on NBC. This meant I had to move to NYC for 6 weeks and spend every day with Donald Trump, Ivanka Trump, and Don Jr. I really had no expectations. I think I was actually the only "Celebrity" that had a semi normal manual labor job. I think this gave me a very different perspective on things. I actually think Donald Trump had no idea who I was or what I actually did for a living. Over the next month I was able to observe him and his kids in their day to day routine. What I saw was a person that treated everyone with respect. Even the (Hispanic) guys in the mail room. He had coffee from the coffee machine and BS'd with them every single morning. Trash men and cops would stop him on the street and he would stop whatever he was doing and spend a little bit of time with every one of them. As the month went on I used my work hard work and perseverance to gain respect of the Trumps and most everyone around me.
I made it all the way to the top 3 and when I was let go Donald Trump stood up and shook my hand and said " Great Job Jesse".
Now I know that a lot of you will think that is some dumb reality TV show, not real life...and especially Not the presidency. Trust me I know that is very true, but the majority of the Anti-Trumps are basing their opinion of him on sound bites from that very same Reality TV Show. I think you should look above what the TV Network put out there to boost ratings. Nobody wants to watch somebody be a nice guy, they want to see him say "Your FIRED!". What I personally observed is a man that is perfect suited to run this country. He is respectful to the little guy (which shows he worked hard to get where he is) and he is also tough as nails when he needs to be. The people he will appoint to key top positions will be top shelf, and you can bank if they don't perform? They will get the boot. Lastly the best quality I observed about Donald Trump is being a dad. This is by far his strongest quality. Ivanka is an super smart, driven woman. The shakes your hand firm and looks you in the eye when she talks to you. Donald Jr. Also has the same smarts and drive, but is also a pretty regular guy that has a "almost" restored 69' Camaro and loves to long range shoot ( don't let anyone know I told you that). The poise in these two shows a lot in their parents. I think we are lucky to have his kids as part of the deal.
So before you guys react to what I have written here. One thing you know about me is Good or bad I will always tell it like it is. This guy Is the Real Deal, and will Make America Great Again.
Thanks for reading "
http://www.labusas.org/forum/showthread.php?174827-Jesse-supports-trump (http://www.labusas.org/forum/showthread.php?174827-Jesse-supports-trump)
https://www.JJFU.com (https://www.jjfu.com) (great 10mm 1911s)
Quote from: ninja on February 05 2016 09:28:51 PM MST
[...]
Pretty good testimonial. I'm starting to warm to the guy that I not long ago thought was just a clown. Trump may well be the only one who can actually get the government fixed.
Jesse James is one of the last people I will take advice from.
.
Jesse James left his 1st wife for a porn star.
Conservative Family Values at its best.
I don't even know who this Jesse James is.
Quote from: Pablo on February 06 2016 01:07:17 PM MST
I don't even know who this Jesse James is.
He is a loudmouth narcissist TV tough-guy who gets suckers to pay lots of money for his crap (choppers, 1911's, and AR's).
(https://s15-us2.ixquick.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.inkedcelebrity.com%2Fimages%2Fjessejames6.jpg&sp=3e9f2924c379d256c5b6108e6b7e9ebf)
NRA has even been sucked in to supporting this clown: http://www.westcoastchoppers.com/
(http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0199/4908/t/4/assets/slideshow_2.jpg?5291491767309545633)
https://www.jjfu.com
You should look at his overprice crap.
.
Yeah. I'll pass.
The tatoos and "urban thug chic" turned me off at first sight. This man is an @$$clown.
Thanks for playing, FOOL!