10mm-Auto

10mm Ammuntion => Factory 10mm ammo => Topic started by: REDLINE on October 10 2012 06:18:23 PM MDT

Title: YouTube - Underwood 10mm and Buffalo Bore 44 Mag VS 3/16" STEEL
Post by: REDLINE on October 10 2012 06:18:23 PM MDT
http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_431833&feature=iv&src_vid=8yVyp-ftbTo&v=eCUFzNLHP2Q (http://www.youtube.com/watch?annotation_id=annotation_431833&feature=iv&src_vid=8yVyp-ftbTo&v=eCUFzNLHP2Q)

For the bullets that penetrated through the steel I wish he would have had water jugs or something behind.  Otherwise not bad at all.
Title: Re: YouTube - Underwood 10mm and Buffalo Bore 44 Mag VS 3/16" STEEL
Post by: harrygunner on October 12 2012 06:29:08 PM MDT
Good video, impressive.

One FBI thought I always remember is under-penetration is more likely to get one killed.

Penetration is important to me.  My threats are usually larger animals like bears and moose. And the only time I thought I would have to pull the trigger involved a group of men in a sedan in Phoenix.

Title: Re: YouTube - Underwood 10mm and Buffalo Bore 44 Mag VS 3/16" STEEL
Post by: REDLINE on October 14 2012 09:53:55 PM MDT
I would have liked to have seen what the Underwood 10mm 155gr XTP load at 1500fps or higher would have done comparatively.
Title: Re: YouTube - Underwood 10mm and Buffalo Bore 44 Mag VS 3/16" STEEL
Post by: DM1906 on October 14 2012 11:48:31 PM MDT
Very entertaining video.  Comparing these calibers is like comparing a Pinto to a Corvette.  Maybe not a Pinto, but it's still apples and oranges.  Anyone who's shot, and loaded, the big magnums (.41 and up), knows there's no comparison.  The 10mm can hold its own with the best, but it's no big magnum.  Even the .460 Rowland, as stout as it is, is still no comparison (as stated by someone on GT recently).  Makes for good video, though.