I am talking, dead honest opinions from all. Obama and the rest of the left are trying their hardest to use this latest crisis to their advantage. I certainly empathize with the victims of the shootings. I read on Fox News where other classes were cancelled in Oregon AND Kentucky. Here locally, the police caught just-in-time, a young high school kid from taking a loaded gun AND gasoline into a local nice school district for God only knows to what end.
I am a conservative, a parent, an ardent/respectful shooter. I can't fathom losing either one of my now grown boys. But, my REAL concern is that if nothing changes, or the pro-gun people don't come up with a solution, the left-wing nut jobs will eventually win - given a few more shootings.
So, what to do?
My wife is a teacher locally at a public middle school. The truth is that guns - both loaded AND unloaded, are taken from kids weekly in her district. The teachers and their unions have wanted metal detectors in schools for many years with no success. The reason? The liberal parents are concerned it would infringe upon their students.
So, again, what are your thoughts?
Thanks,
Pat
These will be some really unpopular opinions here.
First....
We need social economic reforms. Which is not to say welfare. But better safety nets, better training options and better employment options for the economic bottom third of our society.
There is a strong correlation between the Gini coefficient and violent crime by country. The short version is people will turn to violence to ensure they meet certain minimum standards for food, clothing and shelter. The interesting thing the Gini coefficient reveals is that the standard is relative to the socio-economic clime of the populace. A person that is wildly wealthy by sub saharan Africa standards, but poor by LA standards, will turn to mugging.
Second....
We need to de-criminalize recreational drug use. Yes, it is bad and destroys peoples lives. But we are doing even more damage with criminal penalties. Especially in light of recent research which shows that most drug addicts have mental health issues and are in actuality self-medicating. Lets take the money we would spend locking them up and use it to get them treatment.
Third....
We need firearms education classes in middle school. Liberals need to get onboard with the fact that guns are just as much a part of their kids lives as penises and vaginas are. In point of fact, genitals are slightly less than 1 per person in the US, due to accident or birth defect. Guns on the other hand are more than 1 per person. Since they are a reality of our lives, and they are quite detrimental if used improperly, we should absolutely be educating our children about them. The four rules at the very, very, very least. Information about proper range technique and gun handling procedures are a huge plus.
If we get rid of the drug related gun crime, the income equality related crime and the accidental gun deaths, there won't be much left over to gripe about.
With regard to shootings like Sandy Hook, or this guy in Oregon, not much you can do. Other than provide an environment where there are trained first responders who are properly armed (read citizens with guns).
Short of having door monitors (people with capabilities) and inspections for contraband there is always a chance someone would get through whose intent is to do harm. Having trained and armed personnel only works if they have the fortitude to act to stop any threat! let's face it our country can have threats come in any form not just guns, look at the master clock builder! ::)
To be effective this may require hiring trained armed guards, or police.
So complex a question Pat.
I do however respectfully disagree with the notion a few more shootings and left wing nut jobs win or its up to pro gun people to figure out a solution on our own. So much easier to blame the "straw man", but nothing Barry, Hillary, Dianne or any of the rest have offered would have stopped any a single one of these recent tragedies.
In my opinion key variables are far, far too complex for one side's "solution" to resolve it. They include:
1. Mental health - Identification of unbalanced individuals, getting them help. Keeping them from being in a position to harm themselves or others. How, when, where to intercede are huge questions with monumental implications no one seems serious about exploring.
2. The breakdown and dissolution of the fabric of American family, and now marriage (eerie similarities in basic family situation between Sandy Hook and Oregon shooters). So many young people (primarily young men) are just simply lost in this modern world. So many want to be famous, renowned (pissed that they aren't appreciated more, or in last several cases sexually frustrated)A somebody, but Kids seldom taught right and wrong at home or church anymore. It's left to the schools.Parents turning blind eye to their Children's psychosis and all the warning signs.. We could go on, on, on in this section
3. Violent cultural overload as exhibibited in music, television, video games, etc, etc.
4. Evil exists in this world. Always has, always will.
Semi-automatic firearms been readily available in this country for hundred years..... Please list the domestic active shooter mass murders of innocents in 1910's through the early 1966 (Charles Whitman). Country certainly struggled with civil rights and all the history sourounding that topic in those years but the random targeting of innocents is a recent phenomenon it seems to me. The specific targeting or schools even MORE recent. Meanwhile overal gun deaths continue to fall dramatically year after year. Not that you'd ever hear MSM or Barry admit that.
That's the wrong question. The first question you have to ask is whether you prefer liberty to safety. I don't believe that it is government's responsibility to protect us in the first place.
Prevent them???
That's pure folly. That's idealism run wild!!!
I could say there are several things that would help..
Revival
Teach the Golden Rule. Self rule until you harm another, then you owe restitution.
I'd love to see $1000/week military basic trainiing open to all High School and up. Have 6 or so weeks, can take a week at a time, or all in one setting. It would lead to a trained population that would have some level of responsibility, and a source to draw from in a SHTF situation.
Start treating mental illness again, including a safe place to live, get medication levels worked out, and the ability to separate the violent from the general population.
Get people working again. Everyone needs a feeling of self-worth that is obtained from being self sufficient. This goes for summer jobs for students too. Too much negative happens with idle minds. Government dependency destroys the lives of those that fall into the trap.
Stop insulating those that make bad choices from the results of those bad decisions. How are people supposed to learn if they are rewarded for screwing up. Everyone should have the right to screw up, and those that do should bear the consequences.
Most people are decent folks. The more of those that are armed, the better.
Greg
If a group is caught out of the blue, I think this would still happen to some degree. That's even if everyone in that group is also armed!
Someone that crossed my path somewhere in life committed suicide tonight. I think it's more about mental health and people getting the block put on them for firearms based on hints of mental issues!
If they haven't cleared it off yet, feel free to read a little bit of it:
https://www.facebook.com/caleb.rojas.16?pnref=story
https://www.facebook.com/groups/638467266266408/852809608165505/?notif_t=group_activity
I'm waiting for the story to be in the news tomorrow. His responses suggest he may have used a firearm and the warning signs were there.
Quote from: The_Shadow on October 07 2015 03:50:11 PM MDT
Short of having door monitors (people with capabilities) and inspections for contraband there is always a chance someone would get through whose intent is to do harm. Having trained and armed personnel only works if they have the fortitude to act to stop any threat! let's face it our country can have threats come in any form not just guns, look at the master clock builder! ::)
To be effective this may require hiring trained armed guards, or police.
Before the 1960's, there use to be shooting clubs at school, and kids brought rifles to school. I have seen pictures from the 1950's of young kids shooting 22 rifles in their school gym.
.
Good comments
Other things to keep in mind.
While gun violence is higher in the US than most industrialized countries, violent crime rates are not out of line with some other industrialized countries. The media tends to fixate on gun violence, as it is somehow worse to be shot to death than beaten to death. (personally, shoot me).
Also, homicides in the US are the lowest they have been in a very long time. You hear about them more due to the national nature of even local news, primarily due to better communications infrastructure.
And, raggedyman definitely makes a point I agree with. Not the governments place to provide safety. They investigate and prosecute crime, and rehabilitate those convicted, but do not, should not and cannot prevent crime and protect liberty. The two are mutually exclusive.
1) Treat Public Mass Shootings the same way you treat a serial killers crime. Public Mass Shootings are a product of the same mindset as a serial killer, only this person shot their wad in one go rather than picking and choosing single targets.
2) Do not count Public Mass Shootings in the same crimnal catagory as General Gun Violence. A distraught father about to lose everything who kills his wife, two kids and himself at home while everyone sleeps is not the same mentality as someone who walks into a school or movie theater and randomly opens fire.
3) Require Mental Health Professionals to Report people who are a danger to themselves and others to the proper authorities. If you are a Mental Health Professional and you "Contract a Persons' Safety", that person NEEDS to be reported properly.
4) Stop Plea Bargaining Gun Violations. If an illegal drug user is caught in the course of transporting illegal drugs and has a gun in his possession at the time, or a burglar breaks into a home and steals a gun or is in posession of a gun at the time, include the gun charge, do not plea bargain it down. If a gun is one of the items stolen, Prosecute Properly, don't just write it off as "Theft if Personal Property."
I think the bigger issue is keeping them out of the wrong hands before they can use them.
That means we as a people need to step up. If someone in our immediate circle has mental issues that needs reported and especially if they are trying to access/own firearms. In most all of these cases if these people were reported and guns taken, or a block to purchase...
Quote from: Intercooler on October 08 2015 02:50:23 AM MDT
I think the bigger issue is keeping them out of the wrong hands before they can use them.
That means we as a people need to step up. If someone in our immediate circle has mental issues that needs reported and especially if they are trying to access/own firearms. In most all of these cases if these people were reported and guns taken, or a block to purchase...
Problem is, who decides? How much power does that authority have? I've been around long enough that I realize that if a government is given a crack, before long you will be able to drive a truck through it. If they don't want YOU to have a gun, they simply question your mental health, then bye-bye the firearms and you get to check all the boxes that say that when you want to purchase the next firearm.
After all, you must be kinda macho crazy if you even want to touch a gun. You want to train with the self defense guys, would make you paranoid after all.
I think I'll go with "shall not be infringed" and call it good.
Greg
Quote from: Pinsnscrews on October 08 2015 02:34:15 AM MDT
4) Stop Plea Bargaining Gun Violations. If an illegal drug user is caught in the course of transporting illegal drugs and has a gun in his possession at the time, or a burglar breaks into a home and steals a gun or is in possession of a gun at the time, include the gun charge, do not plea bargain it down. If a gun is one of the items stolen, Prosecute Properly, don't just write it off as "Theft if Personal Property."
This... Yes... as long as the gun is associated with a crime against people of their property, the full weight of the law should be brought to bear against the wrongdoer.
Greg
That's just it... nobody out there period has the mental policy to get it done. We seem to be at the end of normal checks and balances!
My wife and I had a long conversation last night regarding mental health issues, screening for purchasing/carrying firearms, etc. My opinion is the same as Greg's "I think I'll go with 'shall not be infringed' and call it good." When government gets into it, there is always someone who is interpreting it different than others. Such as what is happening here in Florida and why some in our legislature are trying to pass a bill to allow open carry.
When government has access to areas of privacy such as mental health records, it can deter those who would normally seek help to skip that entirely. I speak from experience having been in the military where there was no doctor patient confidentiality at least when I was serving. As a Special Agent I had access to everyone's records with just a flash of my badge and their commanders had the same access. Very few wanted to seek out help as a result and when they did it sometimes led to a discharge or other consequences.
Not an easy solution and I'm not smart enough (nor is anyone else) to come up with a solution that solves everything. And, whether you believe it should be the government's responsibility to protect us or not, it is impossible to provide complete protection. Nor would we ever have the resources to provide it. It is our responsibility to protect our selves and our loved ones. That is why "shall not be infringed" was written.
Quote from: Pinsnscrews on October 08 2015 02:34:15 AM MDT
4) Stop Plea Bargaining Gun Violations. If an illegal drug user is caught in the course of transporting illegal drugs and has a gun in his possession at the time, or a burglar breaks into a home and steals a gun or is in posession of a gun at the time, include the gun charge, do not plea bargain it down. If a gun is one of the items stolen, Prosecute Properly, don't just write it off as "Theft if Personal Property."
Quote from: Geeman on October 08 2015 05:06:42 AM MDT
This... Yes... as long as the gun is associated with a crime against people of their property, the full weight of the law should be brought to bear against the wrongdoer.
Greg
I have to disagree in general with gun add-ons to crime. Giving one tool special status over another in the commission of a crime makes that specific tool a target for legislative control.
Having a gun when I do something bad doesn't make what I did worse. And having an add-on creates a perception that just having a gun is bad. We should get rid of these laws, not insist on enforcement.
I guess as it relates to little kids, that means a teacher
Prevention usually starts with some level of education (this is general, not necessarily a schooling).
In order to resolve a concern/issue I like to look at history to see if these events occurred then and what was attempted to correct it then, then identify if it worked then.
Bottom line, things that happen back 200 years happen today. Not sure about the data surrounding them because back then, retaining or creating these records were not as critical. However, just from my prior anecdotal readings, there were mass violence/killings and mental illness concerns back then, continuing through today.
What is the cure? My personal belief is not involving the federal government more. The is a dangerous slippery slope and I'm afraid we are on that slope now. The root cause is not the tool, i.e. firearm, knife, baseball bat etc etc. The cause dwells as a more internal personal issue. Exposing/identifying that behavior is a problem and there is no testing or evaluating that will work for the masses; mainly because those administrating it will have biases and each individual's personality is different; example...each persons' level of pain is different, my pain level of 5 may a pain level of 12 for another. So, having a paid bureaucrat determine the mental state is wrong....if the paid bureaucrat is anti-gun......where do you think their bias will be.
I do believe society has a role, moreover, the person's homelife plays a part and this is where it should start. There is no silver bullet or two silver bullets.
Quote from: sqlbullet on October 08 2015 08:36:25 AM MDT
Quote from: Pinsnscrews on October 08 2015 02:34:15 AM MDT
4) Stop Plea Bargaining Gun Violations. If an illegal drug user is caught in the course of transporting illegal drugs and has a gun in his possession at the time, or a burglar breaks into a home and steals a gun or is in posession of a gun at the time, include the gun charge, do not plea bargain it down. If a gun is one of the items stolen, Prosecute Properly, don't just write it off as "Theft if Personal Property."
Quote from: Geeman on October 08 2015 05:06:42 AM MDT
This... Yes... as long as the gun is associated with a crime against people of their property, the full weight of the law should be brought to bear against the wrongdoer.
Greg
I have to disagree in general with gun add-ons to crime. Giving one tool special status over another in the commission of a crime makes that specific tool a target for legislative control.
Having a gun when I do something bad doesn't make what I did worse. And having an add-on creates a perception that just having a gun is bad. We should get rid of these laws, not insist on enforcement.
The Law is already on the books. Start prosecuting it and watch what effect it has on petty crimes involving guns. If the General Populace wants to hold Gun Owners to Higher Standards, then hold Criminals that use Guns to the Higher Standards you already have on the books. They Gun Control people claim all the time how easy it is to get guns illegally. Because the criminals are not worried about the consequences. They can take a stolen gun from one crime and take it with them for the next crime. As long as they don't actually discharge the gun, they get a slap on the wrist and the gun charges get dropped? Hell No. That Encourages them to keep doing it.
The gun control people are using fringe events to attack core civil rights. I won't concede to their logic and will continue to campaign to have enhancers removed from the law.
And not just for guns. I don't care for alcohol add-ons for traffic violations. What difference does it make if you were distracted because you chose to drink or because you chose to tune the radio, or text, or day dream.
Quote from: sqlbullet on October 08 2015 12:57:55 PM MDT
And not just for guns. I don't care for alcohol add-ons for traffic violations. What difference does it make if you were distracted because you chose to drink or because you chose to tune the radio, or text, or day dream.
Politically obsequious crime "enhancers" are very in vogue these days. Cheap way for politicians to claim they're doing something... So now an assault and battery or murder is EXTRA bad and punishable offense because the victim may have been in a "protected" class or group.
According to these laws, some citizens deserve extra PROTECTION...which no doubt serves as a major deterrent to the neighborhood psychopath bent on causing as much meyhem as possible.
Guys;
I knew this would spark excellent discussion and input. For me personally, since my wife is a teacher, I see this in two related but separate worlds:
1) schools
2) everywhere else
I personally think (deep thought here), that the ultimate/systemic root of these problems is true, pure EVIL at work. Yes, as in, Satan. No one human will address that. Short of root causes, which several have discussed very well here, I am most immediately interested in the K-12 school problem.
We have money to throw at education, almost at-will. Why not spend a TINY part of that for metal detectors? Also, at least here in central Ohio, many of the high school districts have uniformed police officers present all day. Violence since this was enacted has reduced in the high schools where officers are present. I know that is expensive but I think security costs are worth it. Hell, take some of the MANY millions of $$'s spent on school busing to fund it if needed.
The truth is, teachers feel absolutely helpless. They feel they are sitting ducks just waiting for the next incident. Every week they practice lock-down and active-shooter drills with their students (middle school).
I am dating myself, but I remember as a boy in elementary and junior high school doing "air raid" drills in the event of nuclear war (which for everyone was a matter of when, not IF). I was scared out of mind. My wife said most of her kids are scared daily now too. This is pathetic.
Does anyone have actual statistics on the correlation between shootings in "gun-free" zones vs. other areas? I heard someone talk about this on talk radio recently but don't know if they had actual facts.
Additionally, I think parents should be held 100% as accountable for not having guns totally locked up from their children. The parents bought the guns or are storing them; making them accessible (wasn't Sandy Hook that way) to anyone either living OR coming into their home. No warnings, make it a serious crime on incident one. Perhaps that might reduce some of the school stuff.
Tough topic but adults have to be responsible and the schools are by and large treating these incidents STILL, like they are one-offs, rather than preparing for them and being pre-emptive.
Just my thoughts and opinions. Like everything else, no quick or easy fix. I just don't want the left to have anything more to attack than they already have. (circa, Germany, 1935).
Pat
Quote from: sqlbullet on October 08 2015 08:36:25 AM MDT
I have to disagree in general with gun add-ons to crime. Giving one tool special status over another in the commission of a crime makes that specific tool a target for legislative control.
Having a gun when I do something bad doesn't make what I did worse. And having an add-on creates a perception that just having a gun is bad. We should get rid of these laws, not insist on enforcement.
I suppose I should have been more clear. I'm a common law type libertarian. Common law requires a harmed party, and government cannot be a harmed party. Compensation is due to that harmed party. If a gun is used as a tool to harm someone, that is certainly a factor. Armed robbery vs robbery. Rape, assault, home invasion... All of these type crimes should allow for the aggravated circumstance of a lethal weapon used in committing the crime.
I could care less if someone does drugs, drinks, smokes, or other activity that causes themselves harm. It doesn't harm me, so what. I know people at two or three times the "legal" limit of alcohol that would easily drive better than my ex-wife could stone cold sober.
Greg
Quote from: sqlbullet on October 07 2015 09:08:56 PM MDT
Other things to keep in mind.
While gun violence is higher in the US than most industrialized countries, violent crime rates are not out of line with some other industrialized countries. The media tends to fixate on gun violence, as it is somehow worse to be shot to death than beaten to death. (personally, shoot me).
Also, homicides in the US are the lowest they have been in a very long time. You hear about them more due to the national nature of even local news, primarily due to better communications infrastructure.
And, raggedyman definitely makes a point I agree with. Not the governments place to provide safety. They investigate and prosecute crime, and rehabilitate those convicted, but do not, should not and cannot prevent crime and protect liberty. The two are mutually exclusive.
I believe that the only legitimate role of government is to defend the rights of its citizens.
What about that really serious weapon................... the car? Don't we need more laws to combat bad driving? ???
Pat
Modern advances in medicine and social justice have removed the only solution to every problem we acknowledge today. The end result is always the same, in nature and in eras of civilizations. That balancing factor [solution] was Darwinism.
Use the money spent on Planned Parenthood for dealing with mental health issues. If we can help people and assist them in turning their lives around by addressing mental health issues before they get out of hand, the sporadic shootings at colleges and other establishments will likely be reduced.
Address the issue early and "head the problem off at the pass".
1.To curb accidental gun related injuries and deaths in children: In addition to making gun storage and child education about guns a prominent part of any gun related training course there needs to be a basic safety education starting in kindergarten. It should start with "Guns are not for children" being drummed into them and eventually, maybe by middle school or a little earlier, the safe handling of a gun being added to the don't touch.
2. To stop gun use in crimes, enforce the laws on the books! No plea bargaining for anyone using a gun to commit a crime. Lock them up 10 years minimum. Longer if they actually pull the trigger.
3. Make certain dangerous potential psychiatric records, not necessarily in detail, just a go or no go by a mental health professional, a part of the existing background check.
4. Children with behavioral problems in school should be evaluated on a regular basis. Might mean more than a school nurse being necessary.