Interesting.
It's hard to be critical of someone trying something new. However Mike has asked for criticism on other boards before.
I think he should have made closer shots so that most of the hits could have been more center of mass for a fair comparison for Each gun.
Thanks for posting IC! :)
No problem. Maybe it is his range layout? I agree with closer shots though.
IMHO,comparing apples and oranges is not good.We the 10mm afficiandos know what the 10 can do.The .45 is obvious,a proven round over many yrs.The 10 is a whole diff animal,approved by a .45 advocate,nuff said.Col Cooper.
No doubt any 10mm Auto load worth its salt spanks all 45 Auto loads that do or ever will exist. Nothing like pointing out the obvious and preaching to the choir. Guess I couldn't resist. :-[
Had too,it's getting old.Compare it to a 357.
Quote from: pacapcop on June 29 2012 03:40:49 PM MDT
Had too,it's getting old.Compare it to a 357.
Oooops. Wasn't directing that at you. Sorry for it sounding that way being just underneath your other post. I perfectly well liked what you had posted!
Was not sure,but i can take a hit as well.It's not personal,it's the internet.Cheers.
Cheers